Evidence Synthesis and Tables

Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to document sources of research evidence that address a national practice problem, including the level and quality of each source of research evidence. A synthesis of the evidence is conducted to determine the overall strength and quality of the evidence. The development of an evidence table and synthesis are foundational to inform actions and decisions to improve healthcare outcomes. Construction of an evidence table and synthesis supports professional formation of the DNP practice scholar. Course Outcomes This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes. Compare and contrast differences and similarities of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method designs. (POs 3, 9) Analyze qualitative and quantitative data for the purposes of critical appraisal of evidence. (POs 3, 9) Appraise systematic reviews for translation science. (POs 3, 5, 9) Evaluate selected statistical methods for the purposes of critical appraisal of evidence. (POs 3, 5, 9) Synthesize literature relevant to practice problems. (POs 3, 5, 9) DUE DATE: Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6. The late assignment policy applies to this assignment. TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS: 300 Preparing The Assignment Follow these guidelines when completing each component of this assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions. The assignment will include the following components. Title Page Introduction Purpose Statement Practice Problem Identification (identified in Weeks 1, 2, and 3 Discussion) (cited) Sources of Research Evidence Identification (identified in Weeks 1, 2, and 3 Discussion) (cited) Implications of the Practice Problem at the National Level and Local Level (1–2 paragraphs) Significance Prevalence Economic Ramifications Synthesis of Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem, Including 2 Qualitative Research Studies, 2 Quantitative Research Studies, and 2 Systemactic Reviews (identified in Weeks 1, 2, and 3 Discussions) (2 paragraphs) Main Points/Salient Messages That Emerge From the Sources (Cited) Compare and Contrast Main Points From All Sources (Cited) Objective Discussion of Facts Appraisal of the Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem (1–2 paragraphs) Level of Evidence Quality Rating of Evidence Suitability of the Evidence to Address the Practice Problem Summary Tables of Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem Using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Evidence Summary Tool (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. 2 Qualitative Research Studies (identified in Week 1 Discussion) 2 Quantitative Research Studies (identified in Week 2 Discussion) 2 Systematic Reviews (identified in Week 3 Discussion) Conclusion Summation of the Impact of the Practice Problem at the National Level and Local Level Summation of the Appraisal of Evidence to Address the Practice Problem Summation of the Evidence Synthesis References Reference Page With Complete References for the 6 Sources of Research Evidence APA Style and Organization APA Standards for Scholarly Papers Grammar and Mechanics

#Evidence #Synthesis #Tables

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Rubric for Assignment-3 Logical Data ModelInstructions:Draw a logical data model (ERD) for the Picnics R US case [Refer to ‘Assignment#1’

Rubric for Assignment-3 Logical Data ModelInstructions:Draw a logical data model (ERD) for the Picnics R US case [Refer to ‘Assignment#1’ and‘Assiignment#2’ on Canvas under ‘Assignments’]Rubric: 30% – Identify the entities 15% – Add appropriate attributes for each entity 15% – Assign identifies for each entity 15% – Draw the relationships