Examine Case Study: An Elderly Iranian Man With Alzheimer’s Disease

You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this client. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the client’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes. At each decision point stop to complete the following: Decision #1 Which decision did you select? Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results of the decision. Why were they different? Decision #2 Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results of the decision. Why were they different? Decision #3 Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results of the decision. Why were they different? Also include how ethical considerations might impact your treatment plan and communication with clients. Learning Resources Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus. Required Readings Note: All Stahl resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using this link. This link will take you to a log-in page for the Walden Library. Once you log into the library, the Stahl website will appear. Stahl, S. M. (2013). Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. To access the following chapter, click on the Essential Psychopharmacology, 4th ed tab on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate chapter. Be sure to read all sections on the left navigation bar for each chapter. Chapter 13, “Dementia and Its Treatment” Stahl, S. M. (2014b). The prescriber’s guide (5th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. To access information on the following medications, click on The Prescriber’s Guide, 5th ed tab on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate medication. Review the following medications: For insomnia donepezil galantamine memantine rivastigmine Bui, Q. (2012). Antidepressants for agitation and psychosis in patients with dementia. American Family Physician, 85(1), 20–22. Retrieved from http://www.aafp.org/journals/afp.html Note: Retrieved from from the Walden Library databases. Meltzer, H. Y., Mills, R., Revell, S., Williams, H., Johnson, A., Bahr, D., & Friedman, J. H. (2010). Pimavanserin, a serotonin receptor inverse agonist for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease psychosis. Neuropsychopharmacology, 35, 881–891. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/npp/journal/v35/n4/pdf/npp2009176a.pdf Required Media Laureate Education. (2016h). Case study: An elderly Iranian man with Alzheimer’s disease [Interactive media file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

#Examine #Case #Study #Elderly #Iranian #Man #Alzheimers #Disease

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

 Topic:  How do intelligence-sharing mechanisms contribute to enhancing homeland security preparedness and response  For  this assignment you will write

 Topic:  How do intelligence-sharing mechanisms contribute to enhancing homeland security preparedness and response  For  this assignment you will write the Findings/Results/Discussion section  of your thesis. Set forth below is the explanation for this section from  the End of Program Manual (EOP): Findings/Results/Discussion:  This section describes the results of the study. Keep in

Topic: Sustainable Urban Development: A Holistic Approach  engages in an original research question and the relevant scholarly literature and employs

Topic: Sustainable Urban Development: A Holistic Approach   engages in an original research question and the relevant scholarly literature and employs specific evidence appropriate to the disciplines being used. The summary findings should reflect an integrative and interdisciplinary approach to knowledge.  Recommended headings: Research findings/thesis Rationale/justification/Significance Literature review/research (including discipline-specific

topic:- Understanding the Interdisciplinary Dynamics of Cybersecurity Threats   thesis, that engages in an original research question and the relevant

topic:- Understanding the Interdisciplinary Dynamics of Cybersecurity Threats   thesis, that engages in an original research question and the relevant scholarly literature and employs specific evidence appropriate to the disciplines being used. The summary findings should reflect an integrative and interdisciplinary approach to knowledge.  Recommended headings: Research findings/thesis Rationale/justification/Significance Literature

SSESSING A HEALTHCARE PROGRAM/POLICY EVALUATION Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of

SSESSING A HEALTHCARE PROGRAM/POLICY EVALUATION Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can