Use the Walden Library Course Guide and Assignment Help found in this week’s Learning Resources to search for and select a quantitative article (link to article listed below) that interests you and that has social change implications.
By Day 3
Post a very brief description (1 page & 2-3 references) of the article you found and address the following:
- Describe how you think the research in the article is useful (e.g., what population is it helping? What problem is it solving?).
- Using Y=f(X) +E notation, identify the independent and dependent variables.
- How might the research models presented be wrong? What types of error might be present in the reported research?
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
For this assignment, a quantitative article with social change implications has been selected from the Walden Library Course Guide and Assignment Help. The article will be discussed in terms of its usefulness, independent and dependent variables and potential research errors.
Answer:
The article selected is titled “The Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention on Emotional Regulation, Self-Compassion, and Empathy Among Medical Students: An Exploratory Study.” The research aims to determine the effects of mindfulness practices on medical students who face high levels of stress and burnout during their studies. This study can be useful in providing interventions and support to a population experiencing a significant amount of stress and emotional challenges.
The independent variable in this study is the mindfulness intervention, while the dependent variables are emotional regulation, self-compassion, and empathy. The equation for this relationship would be Y = f(Mindfulness Intervention) + E, where Y represents the dependent variable, f is the functional relationship between the independent and dependent variables, Mindfulness Intervention is the independent variable, and E represents the error term.
One potential research error in the study is sample bias. The sample consisted of medical students from one academic institution, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the study was exploratory in nature, and the results may not be replicated in larger, more controlled studies. Another potential error is social desirability bias, where participants may have answered questions in a way that they believed to be socially acceptable, rather than based on their true beliefs or experiences. These errors must be considered in interpreting the study’s findings.
