West Coast Anita Border V Lewisham Legal & Ethical Case Study Discussion

In this assignment, you will write a paper using the information learned from your textbook and a legal case to discuss informed consent.

Choose a case dealing with a question of whether a patient was given proper informed consent before a medical procedure or a case dealing with whether the patient was given proper informed consent in relation to withdrawal of medical treatment. You will need to give the facts of your case, the decision (holding) of the court, and the reasoning of the court. You will also need to explain, in detail, the elements of informed consent and why the informed consent was correct or incorrect.

Finding case law is different than searching for other types of law. A legal professional would, most likely, use the legal search engines, Westlaw or Lexis, but these websites can be very expensive and very difficult to navigate for someone without specific training.

The easiest websites for a non-legal professional to use to search for case law are:

You can also explore the WCU library and ask the librarians for assistance in finding case law.

This paper should be at least two pages, using proper APA format. Please be aware of how to cite case law in APA format; see this resource for assistance:

For assistance with APA formatting, click on the Student Resources tab and then click on the writing resources.

Submit your assignment by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time).

Points possible: 75

Your textbook may be used as a reference. The APA format for your text is as follows:

Reference: Pozgar, G. D. (2016). Legal and ethical issues for health professionals (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction:

Informed consent is a crucial component of the patient-physician relationship, as it ensures that patients are fully aware of the risks and benefits of medical treatments or procedures. In this assignment, students are required to analyze a legal case that deals with the issue of whether a patient was given proper informed consent before a medical procedure or withdrawal of medical treatment. This paper aims to provide a detailed explanation of the elements of informed consent and the correctness or incorrectness of the informed consent process in the chosen case.

Answer:

The case chosen for this assignment is Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772 (D.C. Cir. 1972). In this case, the plaintiff, David Canterbury, underwent a spinal operation to relieve the compression of his spinal cord. The surgery resulted in partial paralysis of Canterbury’s legs and bladder. The plaintiff alleged that the surgeon, Dr. Lyman Spence, did not provide him with sufficient information about the risks involved in the procedure, and as a result, failed to obtain his informed consent.

The court, in this case, held that informed consent is an essential aspect of medical treatment, and the physician has a duty to disclose all the essential risks and benefits of the proposed treatment to the patient. The court further noted that the disclosure must be sufficient to enable an ordinary person to make an informed decision.

The court outlined the elements of informed consent, which include disclosure of the nature of the procedure, its risks, benefits, and alternatives, including no treatment. The court also noted that the physician must provide the disclosure in a manner that the patient can understand and must answer any questions that the patient may have.

In this case, the court concluded that Dr. Spence had not obtained the plaintiff’s informed consent. The court found that the surgeon had not adequately disclosed the risks of the procedure, emphasizing only the benefits of the surgery. The court held that the plaintiff had a right to decide whether to undergo the surgery, and the physician must provide sufficient information to make such a decision.

In conclusion, Canterbury v. Spence is an essential case in the development of informed consent law. It underscores the importance of the physician’s duty to disclose all the essential risks and benefits of medical treatment or procedures to patients. The case emphasizes that the physician must provide the disclosure in a manner that the patient can understand and must answer any questions that the patient may have. The informed consent process must be correct and must be sufficient to enable an ordinary person to make an informed decision.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Machine learning questions. 4 questions. look at attached  1. Please construct a new dataset by either adding two independent variables or removing two

Machine learning questions. 4 questions. look at attached  1. Please construct a new dataset by either adding two independent variables or removing two independent variables from finalsample.dta dataset. If you choose to add two independent variables, you could add any two independent variables that you think help explain stock returns. If you choose to remove two independent variables, you

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached Presenter’s Name:Gregory

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached  Presenter’s Name: Gregory Swim Person Providing Critique: Brianna Davis Component Comments Case summary: Case was summarized in a succinct, easy-to-understand manner and was in the presenter’s own words. I understood the issue confronting the Supreme Court. APA’s brief: The APA’s stance was presented in

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached Presenter’s Name:Lila Davis

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached  Presenter’s Name: Lila Davis Person Providing Critique: Brianna Davis Component Comments Case summary: Case was summarized in a succinct, easy-to-understand manner and was in the presenter’s own words. I understood the issue confronting the Supreme Court. APA’s brief: The APA’s stance was presented in

Please see the file attachedOnline Social Media Principles (12/2/09) Online Social Media

Please see the file attached Online Social Media Principles (12/2/09)  Online Social Media Principles INTRODUCTION  Every day, people discuss, debate and embrace The Coca‐Cola Company and our brands in thousands of online  conversations. We recognize the vital importance of participating in these online conversations and are  committed to ensuring that we participate in online social media the right way. These Online Social Media  Principles have been developed to help empower our associates to participate in this new frontier of  marketing and communications, represent our Company, and share the optimistic and positive spirits of our  brands.  The vision of the Company to achieve sustainable growth online and offline is guided by certain shared values  that we live by as an organization and as individuals:  • LEADERSHIP: The courage to shape a better future;  • COLLABORATION: Leveraging our collective genius;   • INTEGRITY: Being real;  • ACCOUNTABILITY: Recognizing that if it is to be, it’s up to me;   • PASSION: Showing commitment in heart and mind;   • DIVERSITY: Being as inclusive as our brands; and   • QUALITY: Ensuring what we do, we do well.  These Online Social Media Principles are intended to outline how these values should be demonstrated in the  online social media space and to guide your participation in this area, both when you are participating  personally, as well as when you are acting on behalf of the Company. It is critical that we always remember who  we are (a marketing company) and what our role is in the social media community (to build our brands).  The  same rules that apply to our messaging and communications in traditional media still apply in the online social  media space; simply because the development and implementation of an online social media program can be  fast, easy, and inexpensive doesn’t mean that different rules apply.  The Company encourages all of its associates to explore and engage in social media communities at a level at  which they feel comfortable. Have fun, but be smart. The best advice is to approach online worlds in the same  way we do the physical one – by using sound judgment and common sense, by adhering to the Company’s  values, and by following the Code of Business Conduct and all other applicable policies.   COMPANY COMMITMENTS  The Company adheres strongly to its core values in the online social media community, and we expect the same  commitment from all Company representatives – including Company associates, and associates of our agencies,  vendors and suppliers. Any deviation from these commitments may be subject to disciplinary review or other  appropriate action.  The Five Core Values of the Company in the Online Social Media Community