PUB 620 New York University Benchmark Final Project Paper


Please note that each and every assignment has its own word limit.

For your final project, review the feedback provided by your instructor and make revisions accordingly. Integrate the specified aspects from your previous assignments, as directed, to develop your final Program and Planning Project assignment. Use the guidelines below to provide a comprehensive overview of your proposed program. The final paper should be 2,000-2,250 words, not counting your references and appendix.

  • Introduce your proposed program. Include the vision and overreaching goal for the program. Discuss the objectives associated with this goal.
  • Explain the public health issue. Describe the target population affected. Discuss the overall challenges and barriers that create health inequity for this population.
  • Discuss the program model used for your program. Explain why this model is most suited for your target population and your proposed program. Use epidemiologic data (EBP) to support your proposed topic.
  • Indicate how the behavioral health theory supports implementation of the program. Discuss how these will be strategically applied throughout the steps of implementation. How will the theory ultimately assist in reaching the programmatic goal? Provide evidence to support your claims.
  • Describe the necessary stakeholders that need to be involved in order for the implementation of this program to be successful. Propose strategies, including approaches to communication, to develop community coalitions and engage stakeholders.
  • Based on your work plan, discuss program strategies and summarize the steps or activities associated with each.
  • Provide your revised program budget, budget proposal, and justification to support your outlined intervention. Attach your itemized budget in the appendix.
  • Describe the outcome and process evaluations used to measure the success of the intervention. Include specific indicators and data collection or measurement tools.

This benchmark assesses the following programmatic competencies:


3.3 Design a population-based policy, program, project, or intervention.

3.5 Select methods to evaluate public health programs.

4.2 Propose strategies to identify stakeholders and build coalitions and partnerships for influencing public health outcomes.

General Requirements

You are required to cite at least EIGHT sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the discussion question criteria and public health content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required.

While APA style is required, solid academic writing is expected as well, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

PLEASE make sure APA citation and permalink for articles are complete and correct.

PLEASE add the links/sites below to the reference list if you use any of these readings and make sure everything is in proper APA format.

Read Chapter 10 in Health Promotion Programs: From Theory to Practice.


Read “A Framework for Program Evaluation,” located on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC) website.


Read “Section 1: Planning and Writing an Annual Budget” of Chapter 36 in the Community Tool Box, located on the Community Tool Box website.


Read “Types of Evaluation in Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Programs,” located on the Rural Health Information Hub (RHIhub) website.


Read “Public Health Assessment & Program Evaluation” located on the Army Public Health Center website.


MUST haveat least 8 citations with the page numbers and 8 references in APA format.(The List of References should not be older than 2016 and should not be included in the word count.) Include at least one scholarly reference and appropriate in-text citations and Address all points on the DQ. One point will be deducted for not addressing each item mentioned above. Remember that presenting someone else’s work as your own is plagiarism.

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.

It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT presenting an explanation from the context of ethics and the readings for this class

I am a stickler for good organization in everything. I do not want to have to dig for your answers. For instance, if an assignment asks you to provide three examples of something, I suggest that you number them 1-3 so I can find them easily. I also expect that when you submit something as a narrative, you pay attention to how you organize your thoughts: use paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences; and change paragraphs whenever you introduce a new idea. Also, if there are multiple parts to an assignment, use sub-heads within the paper to organize them.

To get maximum points you need to follow the requirements listed for this assignments 1) look at the word/page limits 2) review and follow APA rules 3) create subheadings to identify the key sections you are presenting and 4) Free from typographical and sentence construction errors.



American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Expert Solution Preview


The proposed program aims to address the public health issue of mental health disparities among the LGBTQ+ youth population in the United States. The overarching goal of this program is to decrease the prevalence of mental health disorders and improve access to mental health services among LGBTQ+ youth.


The program’s objectives include increasing awareness and understanding of mental health issues among LGBTQ+ youth, providing culturally competent mental health services, and improving access to mental health services through innovative approaches.

Public Health Issue and Target Population:

The LGBTQ+ youth population in the United States has been found to experience higher rates of mental health disorders, such as depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation, compared to their non-LGBTQ+ peers. This population is also less likely to seek mental health services due to stigma, discrimination, and lack of access. The target population for this program is LGBTQ+ youth aged 13-24 years old.

Challenges and Barriers:

The overall challenges and barriers that create health inequity for this population include societal stigma and discrimination, lack of access to affordable and culturally competent mental health services, and health disparities due to social determinants of health, such as poverty and homelessness.

Program Model:

The program model used for this program is the Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) model. This model is suited for the target population and proposed program as it involves the community in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of the program. CBPR also promotes a collaborative approach and empowers community members to address their own health issues.

Epidemiologic Data:

Epidemiologic data supports the need for this program as studies have found that LGBTQ+ youth experience higher rates of mental health disorders. The 2019 National Survey of LGBTQ Youth Mental Health reported that 42% of LGBTQ+ youth seriously considered attempting suicide in the past year, compared to 17% of non-LGBTQ+ youth.

Behavioral Health Theory:

The Social Cognitive Theory is used to support the implementation of this program. This theory emphasizes the importance of social support, self-efficacy, and behavioral modeling in individual behavior change. By using this theory, the program aims to empower LGBTQ+ youth to seek mental health services and provide them with the tools to promote their own mental health.


The necessary stakeholders involved in implementing this program include LGBTQ+ youth, mental health providers, community-based organizations, policymakers, and school administrators. Strategies to engage stakeholders include developing community coalitions, involving youth in program planning, and utilizing social media platforms for outreach and awareness.

Program Strategies:

The program will involve various strategies, including conducting community needs assessments, developing a referral network of mental health providers, providing youth-friendly and culturally competent mental health services, and implementing a social media campaign to increase awareness and reduce stigma.

Revised Program Budget:

The revised program budget includes costs associated with program implementation, such as personnel, supplies, and marketing. The program also seeks to secure funding through partnerships with community-based organizations and grants.

Outcome and Process Evaluations:

The outcome and process evaluations used to measure the success of the intervention include collecting data on the number of LGBTQ+ youth who seek mental health services, measuring changes in mental health outcomes, and conducting a satisfaction survey with program participants. Indicators include access to care, reduced stigma, and improved mental health outcomes.

Table of Contents

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00

Latest Reviews

Impressed with the sample above? Wait there is more

Related Questions

Family Policy

 BA. (Ord) Social Care. Year 1 Module: Social Policy in Context. Assessment brief: You are beings asked to evaluate a key aspect of policy relating

New questions

Don't Let Questions or Concerns Hold You Back - Make a Free Inquiry Now!