HC306 Herzing University Online Week 6 Unit 6 Financial Overview Presentation

Unit 6 Assignment 1 – Financial Overview Presentation

  • Due
    Sunday by
    11:59pm
  • Points
    50
  • Submitting
    a text entry box or a file upload

Estimated time to complete: 2 hours

Instructions

In previous units, we discussed the importance and purpose of
maintaining financial statements. In this assignment, you will interpret
those financial statements for a diverse group of stakeholders.

You are the Chief Financial Officer of People’s Community Clinic. You
are responsible for delivering a financial overview presentation at the
year-end meeting. Your audience will include employees and leadership
team members of PCC, financial donors, and community members (who may be
potential donors, if they are pleased with the information you
present!)

People’s Community Clinic. (2015). People’s Community Clinic Annual Report (Links to an external site.). (Links to an external site.) [PDF]

People’s Community Clinic (n.d.). People’s Community Clinic (Links to an external site.)[Website]

  • Using the content of the attached annual report document, prepare a 10-minute Powerpoint or Prezi presentation.
    • Include a voice-over or written script (in the speaker’s notes section)
  • You may include visuals of the important sections of the financial
    statements, ensuring the content is easy to read for your audience.
  • Create graphs or charts to illustrate important data.
  • Your closing two slides should summarize the year-end status, and
    summarize assumptions for the year in-progress (i.e. do you expect to be
    profitable, experience loss, why or why not).
  • Your final slide should include any references, in APA format, used to complete your presentation.

Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.

Submit:

  • Financial Overview Presentation – PowerPoint file (.ppt), URL to
    your Prezi presentation, or export the PowerPoint to .mp4, upload to
    YouTube, and provide the YouTube URL

Rubric

HC306 Unit 6 Assignment 1 – Financial Overview Presentation

HC306 Unit 6 Assignment 1 – Financial Overview Presentation

CriteriaRatings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Analysis of Knowledge
PRICE-P

5.0
pts
5

Connects
and extends knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic
study/ field/ discipline to civic engagement and to one’s own
participation in civic life, politics, and government.

4.0
pts
4

Analyzes
knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/
discipline making relevant connections to civic engagement and to one’s
own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

3.0
pts
3

Begins
to connect knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic
study/ field/ discipline to civic engagement and to tone’s own
participation in civic life, politics, and government.

2.0
pts
2

Begins
to identify knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic
study/ field/ discipline that is relevant to civic engagement and to
one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

1.0
pts
1

There
Is some evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.)
from one’s own academic
study/ field/ discipline that is somewhat relevant to civics engagement
and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

0.0
pts
0

There
is little to no evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories,
etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline that is somewhat
relevant to civics engagement and to one’s own participation in civic
life, politics, and government.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Defines Content

20.0
pts
5

Demonstrates
the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem
statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant
contextual factors.

18.0
pts
4

Demonstrates
the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic
statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem
statement is adequately detailed

16.0
pts
3

Begins
to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis
statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual
factors, but problem statement is superficial.

14.0
pts
2

Demonstrates
a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis
statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

12.0
pts
1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.

0.0
pts
0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Relationship to research

10.0
pts
5

Evaluates
materials for scholarly significance and relevance within and/or across
the various disciplines, evaluating them according to their
contributions and consequences.

9.0
pts
4

Examines
materials for scholarly significance within and/or across the various
disciplines to explore contributions in relation to important questions.

8.0
pts
3

Uses
materials in the context of scholarship to develop a foundation of
disciplinary knowledge and to raise and explore important questions.

7.0
pts
2

Engages materials with the intention and expectation of building topical and world knowledge.

6.0
pts
1

Approaches
materials in the context of assignments with the intention and
expectation of finding right answers and learning facts and concepts to
display for credit.

0.0
pts
0

There is little to no evidence of engagement with outside materials used in a scholarly manner.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Conclusion and related Outcomes

5.0
pts
5

Conclusions
(consequences and implications) are logical and reflect informed
evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed
in priority order.

4.0
pts
4

Conclusions are logically tied to and reflect student’s informed evaluation in priority order and are clearly identified.

3.0
pts
3

Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information and are identified clearly.

2.0
pts
2

Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion).

1.0
pts
1

Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed and oversimplified.

0.0
pts
0

Conclusion is either not present, unclear, or does not reflect the information presented.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Writing

5.0
pts
5

The
paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language
conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

4.0
pts
4

The
paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions.
The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling and minor error do
not impair the flow of communication.

3.0
pts
3

The
paper exhibits an acceptable command of written English language
conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or
spelling that impact the flow of communication.

2.0
pts
2

The
paper exhibits a limited command of written English language
conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or
spelling that impede the flow of communication.

1.0
pts
1

The
paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions.
The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the
reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0
pts
0

The
paper does not demonstrate command of written English language
conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or
spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
APA
PRICE-I

5.0
pts
5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.0
pts
4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.0
pts
3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

2.0
pts
2

The
required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major
formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

1.0
pts
1

Several
APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited
understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0
pts
0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5.0 pts

Total Points:
50.0

Expert Solution Preview

As the professor in charge of creating assignments and evaluations for medical college students, it is important to ensure that the assignments given are aligned with the learning objectives of the course. When designing lectures and assignments, it is important to consider the different learning styles of the students and to include various types of assessments to test their understanding of the material. Providing clear and constructive feedback is essential to help students improve and achieve their academic goals. Overall, my role is to facilitate the learning process and help students successfully become competent healthcare professionals.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Rubric for Assignment-3 Logical Data ModelInstructions:Draw a logical data model (ERD) for the Picnics R US case [Refer to ‘Assignment#1’

Rubric for Assignment-3 Logical Data ModelInstructions:Draw a logical data model (ERD) for the Picnics R US case [Refer to ‘Assignment#1’ and‘Assiignment#2’ on Canvas under ‘Assignments’]Rubric: 30% – Identify the entities 15% – Add appropriate attributes for each entity 15% – Assign identifies for each entity 15% – Draw the relationships

Part II: Given the arguments shared in the article titled, “Is Organizational Behavior Overtheorized?” along with what you have read in this unit’s

Part II: Given the arguments shared in the article titled, “Is Organizational Behavior Overtheorized?” along with what you have read in this unit’s assigned readings, how would you address the question? Would you agree or disagree? Why? Part III: The textbook states that at the organizational level, productivity is based upon effectiveness and efficiency.

Research Proposal Draft By the due date assigned, write a 2 page paper addressing the sections below of the research proposal. MethodologyExtraneous

Research Proposal Draft By the due date assigned, write a 2 page paper addressing the sections below of the research proposal. Methodology Extraneous Variables (and plan for how controlled). Instruments: Description, validity, and reliability estimates, which have been performed (on a pre-established measure). Include plans for testing validity and reliability