Practicum Journal Entry I
You will submit a journal entry for Weeks 1-3. Journal entries need to connect your previous professional experience with your practice, competencies/concepts in the program, and the literature. Your journal entry should be week-based and sequential so that all journal entries are contained in one file.
By tomorrow 12/16/18 by 12 pm, write a minimum of 550 words essay in APA format with at least 2 scholarly references. Include the headers as numbered below:
1) Describe the observed activity (1point) (see attached file)
2) Using an evidence-based approach, analyze the problem, issue, or situation. Address questions posed in the weekly practicum pages if appropriate. (2 points)
3) Reveal how the real-world might mirror or diverge from program-related evidence, concepts, and/or theories. (2 points)
P.S. please see attached file summarizing the activities I observed at my practicum site. Please re-write it in your own words to address all the above numbered questions as well as references.
This assignment is due on Sunday 12/16/2018 at 12 pm on AMERICA/New York time zone
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
In this assignment, we will analyze an observed activity during a medical practicum experience. We will analyze the problem or issue using an evidence-based approach and discuss how the real-world may mirror or diverge from program-related evidence, concepts, and theories. This journal entry assignment aims to connect previous professional experience with the practice and competencies/concepts in the program.
1) Describe the observed activity:
The observed activity during the practicum experience involved the participation in patient rounds in a hospital setting. These rounds were conducted by a multidisciplinary healthcare team consisting of doctors, nurses, and other healthcare professionals. The purpose of these rounds was to discuss and plan the care of patients admitted to the hospital.
During patient rounds, the team reviewed each patient’s medical history, current condition, and progress. The attending physician led the discussion, presenting relevant information about the patient’s diagnosis, treatment plan, and any changes in medication or therapy. The team members actively engaged in the discussion, providing their input, expertise, and recommendations.
2) Using an evidence-based approach, analyze the problem, issue, or situation:
By applying an evidence-based approach, we can critically analyze the problem or issue observed during patient rounds. This approach involves integrating the best available evidence with clinical expertise and patient values. In this case, the problem or issue observed during patient rounds was the lack of communication and collaboration among team members.
Effective communication and collaboration are essential for providing optimal patient care. However, during the observed patient rounds, there were instances where team members were not actively listening or did not fully engage in the discussion. This resulted in potential miscommunication, delays in decision-making, and suboptimal patient care.
To address this problem, interventions such as regular team-building activities, communication training, and establishing clear roles and responsibilities should be implemented. Evidence has shown that effective teamwork and communication improve patient outcomes, reduce medical errors, and enhance patient safety.
3) Reveal how the real-world might mirror or diverge from program-related evidence, concepts, and/or theories:
In the real-world, the observed lack of communication and collaboration during patient rounds might mirror the evidence and concepts taught in the program. The importance of effective communication and collaboration is emphasized in medical education programs as essential components of high-quality patient care.
However, in practice, various factors can impact the implementation of these concepts. Time constraints, high workload, hierarchical structures, and individual differences in communication styles can hinder effective teamwork and communication. The real-world often presents complex and dynamic situations that may not have been explicitly covered in the curriculum.
Therefore, it is crucial for healthcare professionals to continuously update their knowledge and skills, adapt to the specific context, and actively seek opportunities for professional development. By doing so, they can bridge the gap between program-related evidence, concepts, and theories, and the real-world challenges they encounter in their clinical practice.
In conclusion, the observed activity of patient rounds in the practicum experience highlighted the importance of effective communication and collaboration among healthcare team members. By analyzing the problem using an evidence-based approach, interventions can be identified and implemented to address the observed lack of communication. It is essential for healthcare professionals to continuously reflect on their practice and strive to bridge the gap between program-related evidence and the complexities of the real-world healthcare environment.
