Discussion Board Rubric Criteria Unsatisfactory Developing Accomplished Exemplary Total Ideas, Arguments, & Analysis0-15 points 16-19 points

Discussion Board Rubric

Criteria Unsatisfactory Developing Accomplished Exemplary Total
Ideas, Arguments,
& Analysis

0-15 points 16-19 points 20-22 points 23-25 points /25

Ideas expressed lack an
understanding of the discussion
topic. Comments are irrelevant,
off-topic, and/or confusing to
follow

Ideas expressed in discussion posts
show a minimal understanding of
the discussion topic. Comments are
general in nature and/or
occasionally may not be relevant.

Ideas expressed in discussion
posts are mostly substantive
and relevant to topic; some
original thought.

Ideas expressed in discussion
posts include original thought,
substantial depth, and are
relevant to topic.

Connection to
Course Materials

0-15 points 16-19 points 20-22 points 23-25 points /25

No connections are made to
readings or other course
materials (lectures, media,
resources, etc.)

Minimal direct connections are
made to readings and/or other
course materials (lectures, media,
resources, etc.)

Some direct connections are
made to readings and/or
other course materials
(lectures, media, resources,
etc.)

Strong, direct connections are
made to readings and/or other
course materials (lectures, media,
resources, etc.)

Writing Quality 0-4 points 5-6 points 7-8 points 9-10 points /10
Reviews show a below
average/poor writing style that
lacks standard English, and/or is
difficult for readers to follow.
Contains frequent errors in
grammar, punctuation, usage,
and spelling.

Review shows an average and/or
casual writing style using standard
English that is generally clear but
contains some errors in grammar,
punctuation, usage, and spelling.

Review shows above average
writing style that is clear
using standard English with
minor errors in grammar,
punctuation, usage, and/or
spelling.

Review shows above average
writing style that is clear using
standard English with minor
errors in grammar, punctuation,
usage, and/or spelling.

Required Peer
Response/
Timeliness

0-10 points 11-20 points 21-30 points 31-40 points /40

One peer review mission or both
responses are below 50 words.

Missing one peer review or both
responses are below 100 words.

Completed both peer
reviews, but responses did
not meet 150 words.

Both peer reviews consist of at
least 150 words and provide a
thoughtful response.

TOTAL POINTS (sum of Criteria) /100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Watch and evaluate in a 3-paragraph paper one of the following TED Talks:Celeste Headlee  Ten Ways to Have a Better ConversationIn your paper, discuss the

Watch and evaluate in a 3-paragraph paper one of the following TED Talks:Celeste Headlee  Ten Ways to Have a Better ConversationIn your paper, discuss the following:  How did the opening gain your attention, establish the speaker’s  credibility, introduce the topic and preview the main points of the speech? How was the body  of the

Treatments for Genitourinary Tract DisordersBased on  Module 6:

Treatments for Genitourinary Tract Disorders Based on  Module 6: Lecture Materials & Resources  and experience, please answer the following questions: 1. Describe urinary tract infection, causes, symptoms and treatment 2. Discuss treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia 3. Describe overactive bladder, causes, symptoms and treatment  4. Treatment options and recommendations for different

Completes reflective journal a. 150 word minimum reflection. b. Summarize new information learned by completing this assignment. c. Reflects on

Completes reflective journal a. 150 word minimum reflection. b. Summarize new information learned by completing this assignment. c. Reflects on how the new knowledge will impact future behavior as a healthcare professional. d. Logical reflective flow which follows standard grammatical rules with minimal (1-2) misspellings and APA where applicable. Patient