Module 2 Discussion       Case Study: J.T.

Module 2 Discussion

  

   

Case Study: J.T.

Purpose:

Analyze and apply critical thinking skills in the psychopathology of mental health patients and
provide treatment and health promotion while applying evidence-based research.

Scenario:

J.T.  is a 20 year-old who reports to you that he feels depressed and is experiencing a significant amount of stress about school, noting that he’ll “probably flunk out.” He spends much of his day in his dorm room playing video games and has a hard time identifying what, if anything, is enjoyable in a typical day. He rarely attends class and has avoided reaching out to his professors to try to salvage his grades this semester. J.T. has always been a self-described shy person and has had a very small and cohesive group of friends from elementary through high school. Notably, his level of stress significantly amplified when he began college.

You learn that when meeting new people, he has a hard time concentrating on the interaction because he is busy worrying about what they will think of him – he assumes they will find him “dumb,” “boring,” or a “loser.” When he loses his concentration, he stutters, is at a loss for words, and starts to sweat, which only serves to make him feel more uneasy. After the interaction, he replays the conversation over and over again, focusing on the “stupid” things he said. Similarly, he has a long-standing history of being uncomfortable with authority figures and has had a hard time raising his hand in class and approaching teachers. Since starting college, he has been isolating more, turning down invitations from his roommate to go eat or hang out, ignoring his cell phone when it rings, and habitually skipping class. His concerns about how others view him are what drive him to engage in these avoidance behaviors.

Questions:

Remember to answer these questions from your textbooks and NP guidelines. At all times, explain your answers. 

1.
Generate a primary and differential diagnosis using the DSM-5 criteria.

2.
Develop a biopsychosocial plan of care for this client.

3.
Compare and contrast fear, worry, anxiety, and panic.

Submission Instructions:

· Your initial post should
be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support
from at least 3 academic sources. 

·
Due Wednesday July 3 at 11:59pm

image1.png

image2.png

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

EDL 717Student DemographicsRevised 3/2/2016 Instructions: Collect student demographics from the school where you are employed The data should include

EDL 717Student DemographicsRevised 3/2/2016 Instructions: Collect student demographics from the school where you are employed  The data should include race, gender, ethnicity, English Language Learners, Special Education (IEP), free and reduced lunch participants, and other data you feel important in addressing adversity. Provide the data in chart form. Include percentage

Principal Interview Follow the instructions found in the bullets below to complete the interview assignment.     EDL 717 Principal Interview Questions rev

Principal Interview Follow the instructions found in the bullets below to complete the interview assignment.     EDL 717 Principal Interview Questions rev (4).docxDownload EDL 717 Principal Interview Questions rev (4).docx Principal Interview.  Interview a local principal to collect data about student demographics, diversity, and cultures present at the school, preferably

Description Section 10: Executive Summary Prepare a 2-page overview that distills the themes and imperatives from your case study and the National

Description Section 10: Executive Summary Prepare a 2-page overview that distills the themes and imperatives from your case study and the National Southwest Border Counternarcotics (NSWBCN) Strategy analysis, providing an integrated and comprehensive summary of your research. Way Ahead or Recommendations Draft a 2-page section to forge consensus within the